<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40823</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the exclusion of delivery charges from the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The authorities were instructed to investigate the matter further to determine any amount due from the petitioner. The judgment highlighted the importance of previous court decisions in establishing the legal principles regarding the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value of goods for excise duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40823</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the exclusion of delivery charges from the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The authorities were instructed to investigate the matter further to determine any amount due from the petitioner. The judgment highlighted the importance of previous court decisions in establishing the legal principles regarding the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value of goods for excise duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>