https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460531 Conviction for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires proof that the accused instigated, conspired, or intentionally aided the suicide; direct or indirect incitement must be shown. Mere marital discord, harassment, or cruelty by the husband, without evidence of such abetment, is insufficient. The presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act was not enough on the facts because the material did not establish conduct amounting to abetment, and the marriage had subsisted for more than a decade. The conviction was therefore held unsustainable, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. en-us Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:40:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460531 Conviction for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires proof that the accused instigated, conspired, or intentionally aided the suicide; direct or indirect incitement must be shown. Mere marital discord, harassment, or cruelty by the husband, without evidence of such abetment, is insufficient. The presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act was not enough on the facts because the material did not establish conduct amounting to abetment, and the marriage had subsisted for more than a decade. The conviction was therefore held unsustainable, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460531