<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40814</link>
    <description>Procedural defects in warehouse stock verification do not, by themselves, negate the evidentiary value of an admitted shortage where the assessee signed the weighment sheets and did not promptly dispute the shortage. The Madras High Court also noted that refusal to supply depositions from another departmental proceeding does not vitiate demand or penalty unless actual prejudice is shown and the withheld material is essential to an effective defence. On those principles, the shortage verification was treated as validly usable and the plea of breach of natural justice failed, leaving the demand and penalty undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40814</link>
      <description>Procedural defects in warehouse stock verification do not, by themselves, negate the evidentiary value of an admitted shortage where the assessee signed the weighment sheets and did not promptly dispute the shortage. The Madras High Court also noted that refusal to supply depositions from another departmental proceeding does not vitiate demand or penalty unless actual prejudice is shown and the withheld material is essential to an effective defence. On those principles, the shortage verification was treated as validly usable and the plea of breach of natural justice failed, leaving the demand and penalty undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>