<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40807</link>
    <description>Imported component parts used to assemble diesel engines qualified for exemption under Notification No. 82/60 because the notification covered parts required for setting up, assembly or manufacture of machinery. The assembled engines were shown to be principally used for industrial and stationary purposes, so a restrictive motor-vehicle classification could not displace the specific machinery entry. Item 72(a) covered machinery including prime movers, while Items 75(10) and 75(11) applied to motor-vehicle parts and accessories, not engines as a whole. The proviso to Item 75(13) also required articles ordinarily used otherwise than as motor-vehicle parts to be classified on their own merits, leaving the exemption intact and the duty demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40807</link>
      <description>Imported component parts used to assemble diesel engines qualified for exemption under Notification No. 82/60 because the notification covered parts required for setting up, assembly or manufacture of machinery. The assembled engines were shown to be principally used for industrial and stationary purposes, so a restrictive motor-vehicle classification could not displace the specific machinery entry. Item 72(a) covered machinery including prime movers, while Items 75(10) and 75(11) applied to motor-vehicle parts and accessories, not engines as a whole. The proviso to Item 75(13) also required articles ordinarily used otherwise than as motor-vehicle parts to be classified on their own merits, leaving the exemption intact and the duty demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>