https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40801 A common appeal against four orders in original could not be rejected solely because separate appeals were not filed for each order, where the filing was within time and the objection was only to clubbing. The defect was procedural and curable, so the appellant had to be given an opportunity to remove the technical deficiency before any decision on merits. The appellate order was therefore set aside, and the matter was directed to be heard de novo on merits after due opportunity to present the case. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 May 2010 09:47:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40801 A common appeal against four orders in original could not be rejected solely because separate appeals were not filed for each order, where the filing was within time and the objection was only to clubbing. The defect was procedural and curable, so the appellant had to be given an opportunity to remove the technical deficiency before any decision on merits. The appellate order was therefore set aside, and the matter was directed to be heard de novo on merits after due opportunity to present the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40801