<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses in GST Proceedings Under Section 75(4), Citing Natural Justice Principles</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85318</link>
    <description>HC quashed the authority&#039;s refusal to allow cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were used in show cause notice under CGST Act. The court emphasized that when third-party statements are relied upon in quasi-judicial proceedings, the fundamental right to cross-examine flows from Section 75(4) of CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The court held that unilateral statements made without providing opportunity for cross-examination cannot be justified under rule of law. The impugned order (Ext.P3) was set aside with directions to permit petitioner to cross-examine the persons whose statements were referenced in show cause notice while continuing the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses in GST Proceedings Under Section 75(4), Citing Natural Justice Principles</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85318</link>
      <description>HC quashed the authority&#039;s refusal to allow cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were used in show cause notice under CGST Act. The court emphasized that when third-party statements are relied upon in quasi-judicial proceedings, the fundamental right to cross-examine flows from Section 75(4) of CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The court held that unilateral statements made without providing opportunity for cross-examination cannot be justified under rule of law. The impugned order (Ext.P3) was set aside with directions to permit petitioner to cross-examine the persons whose statements were referenced in show cause notice while continuing the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>