<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1366 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765301</link>
    <description>In NDPS bail matters involving commercial quantity, Section 37 applies with full rigour and bail is barred unless the accused satisfies the twin conditions of reasonable grounds for believing he is not guilty and that he will not commit an offence on bail. On the facts, conduct such as enquiring about parcels, visiting the post office in disguise, attempting to collect parcels addressed to others, and fleeing when the CBI team was noticed was treated as prima facie evidence of conscious possession and participation in receiving the contraband. The Court held that the custody delay and speedy trial plea did not override the statutory restriction, and regular bail was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1366 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765301</link>
      <description>In NDPS bail matters involving commercial quantity, Section 37 applies with full rigour and bail is barred unless the accused satisfies the twin conditions of reasonable grounds for believing he is not guilty and that he will not commit an offence on bail. On the facts, conduct such as enquiring about parcels, visiting the post office in disguise, attempting to collect parcels addressed to others, and fleeing when the CBI team was noticed was treated as prima facie evidence of conscious possession and participation in receiving the contraband. The Court held that the custody delay and speedy trial plea did not override the statutory restriction, and regular bail was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>