<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1367 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765302</link>
    <description>Section 37 appellate review remains confined to the narrow grounds available under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. A court cannot set aside an arbitral award by substituting its preferred interpretation of contractual clauses where the tribunal&#039;s interpretation is plausible. Contractual provisions governing variations and valuation treated increased geogrid quantity as an excess quantity beyond the Bill of Quantities rather than an instructed variation, attracting the BOQ rate. Reinterpretation through dictionary meanings and reappreciation of the contractual and factual matrix exceeds the permissible scope of Section 37 review. The contractor was entitled to payment at the BOQ rate for the excess geogrid quantity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1367 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765302</link>
      <description>Section 37 appellate review remains confined to the narrow grounds available under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. A court cannot set aside an arbitral award by substituting its preferred interpretation of contractual clauses where the tribunal&#039;s interpretation is plausible. Contractual provisions governing variations and valuation treated increased geogrid quantity as an excess quantity beyond the Bill of Quantities rather than an instructed variation, attracting the BOQ rate. Reinterpretation through dictionary meanings and reappreciation of the contractual and factual matrix exceeds the permissible scope of Section 37 review. The contractor was entitled to payment at the BOQ rate for the excess geogrid quantity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>