https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765345 The HC dismissed the writ petition, concluding there was no violation of natural justice in the assessment process under Sections 143(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the petitioner had sufficient opportunity to present their case through a show cause notice and a video conferencing session. The Court emphasized the petitioner's duty to provide necessary documents and noted the availability of an appellate remedy. The petitioner was advised to file an appeal with the appropriate authority, with the writ petition's pendency period excluded from the appeal's limitation period. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:24:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765345 The HC dismissed the writ petition, concluding there was no violation of natural justice in the assessment process under Sections 143(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the petitioner had sufficient opportunity to present their case through a show cause notice and a video conferencing session. The Court emphasized the petitioner's duty to provide necessary documents and noted the availability of an appellate remedy. The petitioner was advised to file an appeal with the appropriate authority, with the writ petition's pendency period excluded from the appeal's limitation period. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765345