https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765352 HC held that the petitioner, having been unaware of issuance and service of notices and orders, suffered a breach of natural justice and was entitled to benefit of doubt. Finding no material to reject the contention that the impugned order did not appear under the notice tab, and noting the disputed amount is already deposited with the State so no outstanding demand exists, the writ petition was disposed of. The assessee may treat the impugned order as final notice and submit a written reply within two weeks. Petition allowed. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765352 HC held that the petitioner, having been unaware of issuance and service of notices and orders, suffered a breach of natural justice and was entitled to benefit of doubt. Finding no material to reject the contention that the impugned order did not appear under the notice tab, and noting the disputed amount is already deposited with the State so no outstanding demand exists, the writ petition was disposed of. The assessee may treat the impugned order as final notice and submit a written reply within two weeks. Petition allowed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765352