<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765355</link>
    <description>HC found a breach of natural justice where the petitioner had no opportunity to participate because it was not served with the show-cause notice following cancellation of its registration. The court set aside the impugned adjudication orders and remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. On receipt of the notice, the petitioner was granted two weeks to file a reply. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765355</link>
      <description>HC found a breach of natural justice where the petitioner had no opportunity to participate because it was not served with the show-cause notice following cancellation of its registration. The court set aside the impugned adjudication orders and remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. On receipt of the notice, the petitioner was granted two weeks to file a reply. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>