https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765361 The Kerala HC declined to interfere with a composite show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act where adjudication had already commenced on the basis of the taxpayer's reply. Because the taxpayer had been given participation in the process, including cross-examination, the Court found the apprehension of denial of an effective hearing to be premature. It also held that the writ court would not supervise the manner of adjudication or require separate orders for different financial years in the absence of a manifest anomaly. Any grievance against the final adjudication order was left to the statutory remedies under the GST law. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765361 The Kerala HC declined to interfere with a composite show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act where adjudication had already commenced on the basis of the taxpayer's reply. Because the taxpayer had been given participation in the process, including cross-examination, the Court found the apprehension of denial of an effective hearing to be premature. It also held that the writ court would not supervise the manner of adjudication or require separate orders for different financial years in the absence of a manifest anomaly. Any grievance against the final adjudication order was left to the statutory remedies under the GST law. Case-Laws GST Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765361