<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40791</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the inclusion of wooden containers&#039; value and trade discount deduction. However, it upheld the inclusion of charges for grinding and hole-making processes in the assessable value of glass products. The impugned orders were quashed, and the central excise authorities were directed to reassess the value of the excisable goods based on the principles outlined in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40791</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the inclusion of wooden containers&#039; value and trade discount deduction. However, it upheld the inclusion of charges for grinding and hole-making processes in the assessable value of glass products. The impugned orders were quashed, and the central excise authorities were directed to reassess the value of the excisable goods based on the principles outlined in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>