<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40789</link>
    <description>An excise exemption tied to clearances in the preceding financial year was unavailable where the assessee had no production, factory existence, or clearances in that year. A separate statutory exemption notification could not be curtailed by a press note or trade notice adding a consumer pass-on condition that did not appear in the notification itself. Administrative directions could not override or nullify the statutory concession, and the assessable value could not be reworked to defeat the exemption. The later notification was therefore operative without the additional condition, while the earlier exemption claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40789</link>
      <description>An excise exemption tied to clearances in the preceding financial year was unavailable where the assessee had no production, factory existence, or clearances in that year. A separate statutory exemption notification could not be curtailed by a press note or trade notice adding a consumer pass-on condition that did not appear in the notification itself. Administrative directions could not override or nullify the statutory concession, and the assessable value could not be reworked to defeat the exemption. The later notification was therefore operative without the additional condition, while the earlier exemption claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>