https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460508 SC set aside HC's conviction and sentence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC after determining appellant was juvenile at time of offense. Court established through inquiry that appellant's date of birth was 12.07.1984, making him 16 years old when offense occurred on 14.09.2000. School certificates from first attended school satisfied Rule 12(3) requirements. Following Hari Ram precedent, appellant entitled to benefits of Juvenile Justice Act 2000 as he had not completed eighteen years on offense date. Appeal allowed. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:59:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460508 SC set aside HC's conviction and sentence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC after determining appellant was juvenile at time of offense. Court established through inquiry that appellant's date of birth was 12.07.1984, making him 16 years old when offense occurred on 14.09.2000. School certificates from first attended school satisfied Rule 12(3) requirements. Following Hari Ram precedent, appellant entitled to benefits of Juvenile Justice Act 2000 as he had not completed eighteen years on offense date. Appeal allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460508