<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1386 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460510</link>
    <description>ITAT Cochin denied exemption under section 11 to a company registered under section 8 of Companies Act, 2013 for charitable purposes. The assessee claimed its trading business benefited poor farmers through sourcing activities. The Tribunal held that merely employing people or sourcing goods/services cannot be regarded as charitable activity having specific legal meaning. The assessee failed to establish legal obligation or better value transfer to farmers on regular basis to demonstrate non-commercial nature. The trading business, constituting primary income source, was not proven to benefit the poor as claimed. Revenue&#039;s denial of exemption was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1386 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460510</link>
      <description>ITAT Cochin denied exemption under section 11 to a company registered under section 8 of Companies Act, 2013 for charitable purposes. The assessee claimed its trading business benefited poor farmers through sourcing activities. The Tribunal held that merely employing people or sourcing goods/services cannot be regarded as charitable activity having specific legal meaning. The assessee failed to establish legal obligation or better value transfer to farmers on regular basis to demonstrate non-commercial nature. The trading business, constituting primary income source, was not proven to benefit the poor as claimed. Revenue&#039;s denial of exemption was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>