<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 65 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40771</link>
    <description>The court clarified the assessable value calculation under Notification No. 120/75, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It held that post-manufacturing charges like freight and insurance should be excluded from the assessable value, even if shown separately in the invoice. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and relevant notifications in determining the assessable value of goods under the Central Excise Tariff, aligning with the petitioners&#039; interpretation and allowing the revision application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 65 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40771</link>
      <description>The court clarified the assessable value calculation under Notification No. 120/75, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It held that post-manufacturing charges like freight and insurance should be excluded from the assessable value, even if shown separately in the invoice. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and relevant notifications in determining the assessable value of goods under the Central Excise Tariff, aligning with the petitioners&#039; interpretation and allowing the revision application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>