<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Export Promotion Councils Not &quot;State&quot; Under Article 12: HC Dismisses Plea for Childcare Leave at CHEMEXCIL.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85254</link>
    <description>HC ruled against petitioner seeking childcare leave under CHEMEXCIL&#039;s HR Policy. Following precedent in DR JITARANI UDGATA case, court determined that Export Promotion Councils like CHEMEXCIL, despite administrative oversight by Central Government, maintain autonomous character through their Committee of Administration. EPC&#039;s functions do not constitute &quot;public duty&quot; and fail to meet established tests for classification as &quot;State&quot; under Article 12. The administrative control exercised by government is not pervasive enough to override their autonomous nature. Petitioner&#039;s writ dismissed with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies. Court affirmed CHEMEXCIL&#039;s functions parallel GJEPC&#039;s role, though in different sectors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Export Promotion Councils Not &quot;State&quot; Under Article 12: HC Dismisses Plea for Childcare Leave at CHEMEXCIL.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85254</link>
      <description>HC ruled against petitioner seeking childcare leave under CHEMEXCIL&#039;s HR Policy. Following precedent in DR JITARANI UDGATA case, court determined that Export Promotion Councils like CHEMEXCIL, despite administrative oversight by Central Government, maintain autonomous character through their Committee of Administration. EPC&#039;s functions do not constitute &quot;public duty&quot; and fail to meet established tests for classification as &quot;State&quot; under Article 12. The administrative control exercised by government is not pervasive enough to override their autonomous nature. Petitioner&#039;s writ dismissed with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies. Court affirmed CHEMEXCIL&#039;s functions parallel GJEPC&#039;s role, though in different sectors.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>