<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1332 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765267</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld provisional attachment orders for benami properties where a non-tribal person circumvented Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code restrictions by purchasing tribal land through a Scheduled Tribe individual. The Tribunal rejected the fiduciary relationship exception under Section 2(9)(A)(ii) of PBPT Act 1988, finding the transaction was undertaken to contravene law. Properties purchased by the benamidar for the beneficial owner&#039;s benefit were rightfully attached as benami properties. The matter was partially remanded for factual verification of certain properties while appeals regarding other properties were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 16:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1332 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765267</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld provisional attachment orders for benami properties where a non-tribal person circumvented Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code restrictions by purchasing tribal land through a Scheduled Tribe individual. The Tribunal rejected the fiduciary relationship exception under Section 2(9)(A)(ii) of PBPT Act 1988, finding the transaction was undertaken to contravene law. Properties purchased by the benamidar for the beneficial owner&#039;s benefit were rightfully attached as benami properties. The matter was partially remanded for factual verification of certain properties while appeals regarding other properties were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>