https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765268 The Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition challenging provisional attachment orders under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act. The court held that petitioners should pursue the statutory appellate remedy under Section 46 rather than constitutional jurisdiction. The court granted liberty to file appeals before the Appellate Tribunal by 28th February 2025, with the period of pending writ petition excluded from limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Appeals filed within this timeframe would not be dismissed for delay. The court directed that confiscation proceedings scheduled before the Adjudicating Authority on 28th January 2025 should afford petitioners time if they exercise the appellate remedy option. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:00:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765268 The Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition challenging provisional attachment orders under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act. The court held that petitioners should pursue the statutory appellate remedy under Section 46 rather than constitutional jurisdiction. The court granted liberty to file appeals before the Appellate Tribunal by 28th February 2025, with the period of pending writ petition excluded from limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Appeals filed within this timeframe would not be dismissed for delay. The court directed that confiscation proceedings scheduled before the Adjudicating Authority on 28th January 2025 should afford petitioners time if they exercise the appellate remedy option. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765268