<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1357 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765292</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC held that the order dated 30 March 2021 was a draft assessment order, not a final assessment order, as mandatory procedures were not followed. Consequently, the demand notice dated 30 March 2021, penalty order dated 16 March 2022, and recovery notices dated 30 December 2021 were quashed and set aside. The court ruled that tax or penalty demands and recovery actions cannot be based on a draft assessment order alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1357 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765292</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC held that the order dated 30 March 2021 was a draft assessment order, not a final assessment order, as mandatory procedures were not followed. Consequently, the demand notice dated 30 March 2021, penalty order dated 16 March 2022, and recovery notices dated 30 December 2021 were quashed and set aside. The court ruled that tax or penalty demands and recovery actions cannot be based on a draft assessment order alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>