<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 956 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460501</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted where the petitioner challenged a show cause process on the ground that seized documents and records, referred to in the proceedings, had not been supplied. The Delhi High Court treated the non-supply grievance as serious enough for threshold consideration and stayed operation of the impugned order until the next hearing, pending further examination of whether the relied-upon material had been properly disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:10:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 956 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460501</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted where the petitioner challenged a show cause process on the ground that seized documents and records, referred to in the proceedings, had not been supplied. The Delhi High Court treated the non-supply grievance as serious enough for threshold consideration and stayed operation of the impugned order until the next hearing, pending further examination of whether the relied-upon material had been properly disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>