<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1405 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460503</link>
    <description>Paper returns filed by the petitioner were processed under section 143(1), and the High Court noted that leave to file such returns had earlier been granted subject to the final outcome of the petitions. As the returns had now been processed, the Court held that nothing survived in the petitions and disposed of them with liberty to the parties to take steps in accordance with law. The Court expressly clarified that it had made no observation on the merits of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:58:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1405 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460503</link>
      <description>Paper returns filed by the petitioner were processed under section 143(1), and the High Court noted that leave to file such returns had earlier been granted subject to the final outcome of the petitions. As the returns had now been processed, the Court held that nothing survived in the petitions and disposed of them with liberty to the parties to take steps in accordance with law. The Court expressly clarified that it had made no observation on the merits of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>