<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40751</link>
    <description>Magnetite electrodes imported without copper coating and copper strips were treated as apparatus or component parts specially shaped for use in an industrial system, so they fell within entry 72(c) or 72(3) rather than the residuary entry 87. The court noted that the copper coating only improved efficiency and was not indispensable to the goods&#039; essential character or use. It also held that the consumable-material reasoning could not support the classification because that ground had not been put to the importer in the show-cause notice, and the classification was vitiated by reliance on irrelevant considerations. The impugned customs order was set aside and the writ petition succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:47:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40751</link>
      <description>Magnetite electrodes imported without copper coating and copper strips were treated as apparatus or component parts specially shaped for use in an industrial system, so they fell within entry 72(c) or 72(3) rather than the residuary entry 87. The court noted that the copper coating only improved efficiency and was not indispensable to the goods&#039; essential character or use. It also held that the consumable-material reasoning could not support the classification because that ground had not been put to the importer in the show-cause notice, and the classification was vitiated by reliance on irrelevant considerations. The impugned customs order was set aside and the writ petition succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>