<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40745</link>
    <description>For excise valuation under section 4, the meaning of &quot;related person&quot; must be determined only within the statute itself, and concepts from the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act cannot be imported to enlarge that definition. After-sales or warranty service, by itself, does not create the statutory relationship. Mere wholesale dealing, limited supply arrangements, or marketing and service functions also do not establish mutuality of interest or a distributorship in the legal sense. On that basis, the valuation approach based on the buyers&#039; resale price was unsustainable, while the constitutional challenge to section 4 was left undecided as unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40745</link>
      <description>For excise valuation under section 4, the meaning of &quot;related person&quot; must be determined only within the statute itself, and concepts from the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act cannot be imported to enlarge that definition. After-sales or warranty service, by itself, does not create the statutory relationship. Mere wholesale dealing, limited supply arrangements, or marketing and service functions also do not establish mutuality of interest or a distributorship in the legal sense. On that basis, the valuation approach based on the buyers&#039; resale price was unsustainable, while the constitutional challenge to section 4 was left undecided as unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>