<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40738</link>
    <description>A curer&#039;s liability for excise duty on cured tobacco under Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 ends when the transfer of ownership is reported to, and acknowledged by, the proper officer having jurisdiction over the curer&#039;s premises. The &quot;proper officer&quot; refers to the officer within whose jurisdiction the curing operation is carried on, while the transferee warehouse licensee remains answerable to the officer in charge of the transferee&#039;s premises. Once the curer has followed the prescribed procedure, liability cannot be extended merely because the transferee&#039;s local officer was not informed. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40738</link>
      <description>A curer&#039;s liability for excise duty on cured tobacco under Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 ends when the transfer of ownership is reported to, and acknowledged by, the proper officer having jurisdiction over the curer&#039;s premises. The &quot;proper officer&quot; refers to the officer within whose jurisdiction the curing operation is carried on, while the transferee warehouse licensee remains answerable to the officer in charge of the transferee&#039;s premises. Once the curer has followed the prescribed procedure, liability cannot be extended merely because the transferee&#039;s local officer was not informed. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>