<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 79 - Government of India</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40718</link>
    <description>The Government of India dropped the revision proceedings and upheld the classification of cinema chairs as non-excisable under Item No. 40 of the Central Excise Tariff. The decision was based on the chairs being fixed to the floor in cinema halls, making them inseparable from the hall itself and unsuitable for use outside without further fabrication. The Government accepted the company&#039;s argument that movability is essential to classify an item as furniture, ultimately exempting the chairs from excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 79 - Government of India</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40718</link>
      <description>The Government of India dropped the revision proceedings and upheld the classification of cinema chairs as non-excisable under Item No. 40 of the Central Excise Tariff. The decision was based on the chairs being fixed to the floor in cinema halls, making them inseparable from the hall itself and unsuitable for use outside without further fabrication. The Government accepted the company&#039;s argument that movability is essential to classify an item as furniture, ultimately exempting the chairs from excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>