<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Orders Release: CGST Act Section 69 Does Not Override CrPC 41/41A Safeguards in Arrest Procedures.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85246</link>
    <description>DSC examined judicial remand application under Sec 167 CrPC and Sec 187 BNSS Act. While arrest grounds were properly documented with accused&#039;s acknowledgment, the court found procedural deficiencies. Despite prosecution&#039;s argument that Sec 69 CGST Act exempted compliance with Sec 41/41A CrPC requirements for arrests, the court relied on SC precedents (Arnesh Kumar and Gujarat State cases) mandating these safeguards for offenses punishable up to 7 years. The court ordered accused&#039;s release, finding arrest illegal due to non-compliance with Sec 41/41A CrPC and Sec 35 BNSS Act procedures. Prosecution retained liberty to re-arrest following proper procedures under relevant sections of CrPC, BNSS Act, and CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Orders Release: CGST Act Section 69 Does Not Override CrPC 41/41A Safeguards in Arrest Procedures.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85246</link>
      <description>DSC examined judicial remand application under Sec 167 CrPC and Sec 187 BNSS Act. While arrest grounds were properly documented with accused&#039;s acknowledgment, the court found procedural deficiencies. Despite prosecution&#039;s argument that Sec 69 CGST Act exempted compliance with Sec 41/41A CrPC requirements for arrests, the court relied on SC precedents (Arnesh Kumar and Gujarat State cases) mandating these safeguards for offenses punishable up to 7 years. The court ordered accused&#039;s release, finding arrest illegal due to non-compliance with Sec 41/41A CrPC and Sec 35 BNSS Act procedures. Prosecution retained liberty to re-arrest following proper procedures under relevant sections of CrPC, BNSS Act, and CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>