<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1271 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765207</link>
    <description>SC held that CESTAT had found the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice challenging declared value and confiscation. The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata, for adjudication consistent with that view and disposed of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1271 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765207</link>
      <description>SC held that CESTAT had found the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice challenging declared value and confiscation. The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata, for adjudication consistent with that view and disposed of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>