<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1289 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765225</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai held that credit card payments of personal nature cannot be taxed as perquisite in director&#039;s hands under section 2(24)(iv) when company voluntarily disallowed same expenses under section 37(1) while computing business income. Since company did not claim personal expenditure as business deduction and paid taxes thereon, taxing director again would constitute double taxation. AO&#039;s addition was unjustified as director received no additional benefit from company. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1289 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765225</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai held that credit card payments of personal nature cannot be taxed as perquisite in director&#039;s hands under section 2(24)(iv) when company voluntarily disallowed same expenses under section 37(1) while computing business income. Since company did not claim personal expenditure as business deduction and paid taxes thereon, taxing director again would constitute double taxation. AO&#039;s addition was unjustified as director received no additional benefit from company. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>