<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1291 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765227</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of bad debts claim. The tribunal held that after April 1, 1989, it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that debt has actually become irrecoverable. It is sufficient if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The tribunal relied on SC precedent in TRF Ltd case, finding the first appellate authority&#039;s upholding of the AO&#039;s order unjustified, and allowed the bad debt claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1291 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765227</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of bad debts claim. The tribunal held that after April 1, 1989, it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that debt has actually become irrecoverable. It is sufficient if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The tribunal relied on SC precedent in TRF Ltd case, finding the first appellate authority&#039;s upholding of the AO&#039;s order unjustified, and allowed the bad debt claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>