<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1293 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765229</link>
    <description>A condonation request under section 119(2)(b) for filing a revised return and claiming additional refund was held not maintainable because it was made beyond the six-year limit in CBDT Circular No. 9/2015. The Court noted that the claim concerned belated TDS credit and was, in substance, an attempt to secure a further refund after expiry of the prescribed period. Relief was also unavailable because the application did not satisfy the circular&#039;s requirement of a correct, genuine claim based on genuine hardship. The absence of an assessment order under sections 143(1) or 143(3) did not alter the time bar, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1293 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765229</link>
      <description>A condonation request under section 119(2)(b) for filing a revised return and claiming additional refund was held not maintainable because it was made beyond the six-year limit in CBDT Circular No. 9/2015. The Court noted that the claim concerned belated TDS credit and was, in substance, an attempt to secure a further refund after expiry of the prescribed period. Relief was also unavailable because the application did not satisfy the circular&#039;s requirement of a correct, genuine claim based on genuine hardship. The absence of an assessment order under sections 143(1) or 143(3) did not alter the time bar, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>