<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 80 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40705</link>
    <description>Cost of die-cast recovered from customers and later appropriated was treated as part of the consideration for aluminium extrusions, so it formed part of the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, both before and after the 1-10-1975 amendment. For the later period, the normal price was not limited to the extrusion price alone because the manufacturer also received an additional amount from the buyer. For the earlier period, the wholesale cash price of goods capable of sale was taken to include the die-cast cost where the buyer bore that cost and the goods were marketed on that basis. The demand was also maintainable under Rule 10A as the residuary recovery provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 80 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40705</link>
      <description>Cost of die-cast recovered from customers and later appropriated was treated as part of the consideration for aluminium extrusions, so it formed part of the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, both before and after the 1-10-1975 amendment. For the later period, the normal price was not limited to the extrusion price alone because the manufacturer also received an additional amount from the buyer. For the earlier period, the wholesale cash price of goods capable of sale was taken to include the die-cast cost where the buyer bore that cost and the goods were marketed on that basis. The demand was also maintainable under Rule 10A as the residuary recovery provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>