https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460480 After accepting the outstanding liability and seeking instalments, the petitioners did not contemporaneously pursue waiver of penalty. The later attempt to revive waiver was treated as inconsistent with their prior conduct, especially after payment had been made and the dispute had been treated as closed. On that basis, the claim for waiver could not be reopened, and the petitioners remained bound by their earlier acquiescence; the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460480 After accepting the outstanding liability and seeking instalments, the petitioners did not contemporaneously pursue waiver of penalty. The later attempt to revive waiver was treated as inconsistent with their prior conduct, especially after payment had been made and the dispute had been treated as closed. On that basis, the claim for waiver could not be reopened, and the petitioners remained bound by their earlier acquiescence; the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460480