https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40702 Recovery of an excise demand arising from alleged manufacture and clandestine removal was stayed because revisional proceedings were still pending and the adjudication was said to be assailable, including for lack of cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were relied upon. Execution of the demand was treated as inappropriate until the revision was decided, and the revisional authority was directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 May 2010 15:03:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40702 Recovery of an excise demand arising from alleged manufacture and clandestine removal was stayed because revisional proceedings were still pending and the adjudication was said to be assailable, including for lack of cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were relied upon. Execution of the demand was treated as inappropriate until the revision was decided, and the revisional authority was directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40702