https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40697 The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to the discretionary relief of a writ of Mandamus for the refund of excise duty. The court highlighted that the payments were voluntary, the petitioners benefited from them, and there was a significant delay in seeking relief. The petitioners were advised to pursue a remedy through a civil court if desired. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Sun, 18 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 May 2010 13:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40697 The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to the discretionary relief of a writ of Mandamus for the refund of excise duty. The court highlighted that the payments were voluntary, the petitioners benefited from them, and there was a significant delay in seeking relief. The petitioners were advised to pursue a remedy through a civil court if desired. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 18 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40697