<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Try to amicably resolve dispute over &#039;Lodha&#039; trademark: HC to Lodha brothers</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=31577</link>
    <description>The High Court urged mediation in a familial trademark dispute where Macrotech Developers alleges proprietary rights in the Lodha trademark, seeks a perpetual injunction and damages, and contends it never permitted the defendant&#039;s use of the name. The court observed the dispute arises between brothers, asked if parties would pursue mediation, and proposed appointing a senior retired judge as mediator to complete proceedings expeditiously. Background includes a 2015 separation and family settlement agreements in 2017 and 2023, with the plaintiff asserting it was not bound by the 2023 agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Try to amicably resolve dispute over &#039;Lodha&#039; trademark: HC to Lodha brothers</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=31577</link>
      <description>The High Court urged mediation in a familial trademark dispute where Macrotech Developers alleges proprietary rights in the Lodha trademark, seeks a perpetual injunction and damages, and contends it never permitted the defendant&#039;s use of the name. The court observed the dispute arises between brothers, asked if parties would pursue mediation, and proposed appointing a senior retired judge as mediator to complete proceedings expeditiously. Background includes a 2015 separation and family settlement agreements in 2017 and 2023, with the plaintiff asserting it was not bound by the 2023 agreement.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=31577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>