<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40692</link>
    <description>The court held that post-manufacturing costs and profits should be excluded in determining the assessable value under the new Section 4 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The impugned order disallowing these deductions was set aside. The court did not address the legislative competence issue as the primary ground of challenge was accepted. The respondents were directed to consider the petitioner&#039;s revised price lists and refund the amount paid under protest. No costs were awarded, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40692</link>
      <description>The court held that post-manufacturing costs and profits should be excluded in determining the assessable value under the new Section 4 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The impugned order disallowing these deductions was set aside. The court did not address the legislative competence issue as the primary ground of challenge was accepted. The respondents were directed to consider the petitioner&#039;s revised price lists and refund the amount paid under protest. No costs were awarded, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>