<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order u/s 153C Quashed: ITAT Rules 111-Day Delay Beyond December 2020 Deadline Makes Order Time-Barred.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85214</link>
    <description>ITAT determined the assessment order under s.153C r/w s.143(3) for AY 2016-17 was barred by limitation. The order dated 21.04.2021 exceeded the statutory deadline of 31.12.2020 by 111 days. Following the legal maxim &#039;Expressio unius est exclusion alteris&#039;, when statute prescribes a specific timeframe, compliance is mandatory and no alternative method is permissible. The assessment should have been completed within prescribed 9 months or 21 months period, whichever is later, per s.153B. Since AO failed to pass the order within statutory limitation period, the assessment was quashed and appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed on grounds of time-barred proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order u/s 153C Quashed: ITAT Rules 111-Day Delay Beyond December 2020 Deadline Makes Order Time-Barred.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85214</link>
      <description>ITAT determined the assessment order under s.153C r/w s.143(3) for AY 2016-17 was barred by limitation. The order dated 21.04.2021 exceeded the statutory deadline of 31.12.2020 by 111 days. Following the legal maxim &#039;Expressio unius est exclusion alteris&#039;, when statute prescribes a specific timeframe, compliance is mandatory and no alternative method is permissible. The assessment should have been completed within prescribed 9 months or 21 months period, whichever is later, per s.153B. Since AO failed to pass the order within statutory limitation period, the assessment was quashed and appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed on grounds of time-barred proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>