<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT Overturns Rs. 2.39 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand, Validates Input Services and Capital Goods Treatment u/r 3(5A).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85194</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed appeal concerning CENVAT credit disputes. Tribunal set aside demand of Rs.1,79,11,286 based on ST-3 returns and credit register differences, noting statutory compliance in utilizing 50% credit on capital goods. Demand of Rs.59,94,339 for input services was reversed as manpower services qualified as eligible inputs for telephonic services. Demand u/r 3(5A) for capital goods sold as scrap was invalidated as no CENVAT credit was originally claimed on pre-2004 goods. Extended limitation period was rejected considering regular ST-3 filing, departmental audits, and appellant&#039;s PSU status precluding mala fide intent. All demands were set aside and appeal was allowed in appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT Overturns Rs. 2.39 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand, Validates Input Services and Capital Goods Treatment u/r 3(5A).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85194</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed appeal concerning CENVAT credit disputes. Tribunal set aside demand of Rs.1,79,11,286 based on ST-3 returns and credit register differences, noting statutory compliance in utilizing 50% credit on capital goods. Demand of Rs.59,94,339 for input services was reversed as manpower services qualified as eligible inputs for telephonic services. Demand u/r 3(5A) for capital goods sold as scrap was invalidated as no CENVAT credit was originally claimed on pre-2004 goods. Extended limitation period was rejected considering regular ST-3 filing, departmental audits, and appellant&#039;s PSU status precluding mala fide intent. All demands were set aside and appeal was allowed in appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>