<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cooperative Society Wins Service Tax Appeal: 75% Abatement Valid Under N/N 30/2012-ST, Pure Agent Reimbursements Non-Taxable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85192</link>
    <description>CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant cooperative society, confirming their eligibility for 75% service tax abatement under N/N. 30/2012-ST. The tribunal held that as a registered cooperative society, appellant qualified for tax reduction and had properly discharged 25% tax liability. Following SC precedent in Intercontinental Consultants case, amounts received as pure agent reimbursements (salaries, PF, ESI) were deemed non-taxable. Extended limitation period was incorrectly invoked as there was no tax evasion, given appellant&#039;s legitimate exemption claim. The tribunal set aside the original order denying exemption and service tax demands on reimbursements, fully allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cooperative Society Wins Service Tax Appeal: 75% Abatement Valid Under N/N 30/2012-ST, Pure Agent Reimbursements Non-Taxable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85192</link>
      <description>CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant cooperative society, confirming their eligibility for 75% service tax abatement under N/N. 30/2012-ST. The tribunal held that as a registered cooperative society, appellant qualified for tax reduction and had properly discharged 25% tax liability. Following SC precedent in Intercontinental Consultants case, amounts received as pure agent reimbursements (salaries, PF, ESI) were deemed non-taxable. Extended limitation period was incorrectly invoked as there was no tax evasion, given appellant&#039;s legitimate exemption claim. The tribunal set aside the original order denying exemption and service tax demands on reimbursements, fully allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>