<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1244 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765180</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC directed respondents to reimburse differential GST amount paid by petitioner for executed works. The court relied on precedent from another case involving similar GST reimbursement issues. The HC ordered respondents to reimburse the GST amount as specified in petitioner&#039;s representation dated 21.11.2024. The petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner seeking refund of excess GST payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1244 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765180</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC directed respondents to reimburse differential GST amount paid by petitioner for executed works. The court relied on precedent from another case involving similar GST reimbursement issues. The HC ordered respondents to reimburse the GST amount as specified in petitioner&#039;s representation dated 21.11.2024. The petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner seeking refund of excess GST payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>