<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bogus Sales</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119549</link>
    <description>Taxpayer showed banked sales and paid GST; purchaser admitted cheque discounting. Assessing officer treated receipts as unexplained cash credits. Respondents dispute whether income-tax addition is appropriate versus GST remedies: examine genuineness of supply, evidence of movement, whether ITC was legitimately used, and possible characterization as bill trading requiring reversal of input tax credit and GST anti-evasion action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:14:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 20:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bogus Sales</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119549</link>
      <description>Taxpayer showed banked sales and paid GST; purchaser admitted cheque discounting. Assessing officer treated receipts as unexplained cash credits. Respondents dispute whether income-tax addition is appropriate versus GST remedies: examine genuineness of supply, evidence of movement, whether ITC was legitimately used, and possible characterization as bill trading requiring reversal of input tax credit and GST anti-evasion action.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:14:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>