<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 38 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40669</link>
    <description>The value of PP caps was not to be universally added to the assessable value of metal containers for central excise duty where the caps were supplied under separate orders and could be treated as distinct excisable goods. The Government accepted that the containers were complete products by themselves and that the caps were not necessarily integral to them. On that basis, the proposed inclusion of cap value in the container assessment was held unjustified, and the revision was allowed with consequential benefits to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 11:44:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 38 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40669</link>
      <description>The value of PP caps was not to be universally added to the assessable value of metal containers for central excise duty where the caps were supplied under separate orders and could be treated as distinct excisable goods. The Government accepted that the containers were complete products by themselves and that the caps were not necessarily integral to them. On that basis, the proposed inclusion of cap value in the container assessment was held unjustified, and the revision was allowed with consequential benefits to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>