<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Additional evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119548</link>
    <description>Whether the CESTAT may admit additional evidence under Rule 23 is contested where documents were shown to the adjudicating authority but not recorded and the Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed demand for non submission. The discussion cites tribunal and High Court decisions, and distinguishes remand for verification from admission of late evidence, focusing on relevance, materiality and reasons for prior non production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 00:36:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 22:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Additional evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119548</link>
      <description>Whether the CESTAT may admit additional evidence under Rule 23 is contested where documents were shown to the adjudicating authority but not recorded and the Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed demand for non submission. The discussion cites tribunal and High Court decisions, and distinguishes remand for verification from admission of late evidence, focusing on relevance, materiality and reasons for prior non production.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 00:36:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>