<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1523 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460459</link>
    <description>Bail was refused where the petitioner had been summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 and had already challenged those notices without success. In that backdrop, the court held that the petitioners remained bound to appear before the customs authorities, and declined to entertain the request for bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 15:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1523 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460459</link>
      <description>Bail was refused where the petitioner had been summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 and had already challenged those notices without success. In that backdrop, the court held that the petitioners remained bound to appear before the customs authorities, and declined to entertain the request for bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>