https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40661 The court found that the customs department lacked legal basis to charge the petitioner for storage expenses of seized goods since they were not stored in a designated warehouse. As a result, the order directing the petitioner to pay the specified amount for expenses was deemed illegal, and the court quashed the order. The writ petition was allowed, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 May 2010 11:22:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40661 The court found that the customs department lacked legal basis to charge the petitioner for storage expenses of seized goods since they were not stored in a designated warehouse. As a result, the order directing the petitioner to pay the specified amount for expenses was deemed illegal, and the court quashed the order. The writ petition was allowed, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40661