<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765083</link>
    <description>An assessment completed after fixing the hearing during the Covid-19 lockdown was held to have been passed without a meaningful opportunity to reply or be heard. On that factual basis, the assessment was quashed for breach of natural justice and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee an opportunity to file a reply and participate in a hearing. The rectification order did not survive once the assessment order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765083</link>
      <description>An assessment completed after fixing the hearing during the Covid-19 lockdown was held to have been passed without a meaningful opportunity to reply or be heard. On that factual basis, the assessment was quashed for breach of natural justice and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee an opportunity to file a reply and participate in a hearing. The rectification order did not survive once the assessment order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>