<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1176 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765112</link>
    <description>Loose sheets, impounded papers and rough notings, without corroborative material, were held insufficient to sustain additions for alleged on-money, unexplained money or unexplained expenditure. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the papers were estimate-based or preparatory was accepted because the registered sale deeds reflected the recorded transactions and the Revenue produced no independent evidence of cash payments, undisclosed consideration or actual expenditure. In the absence of effective contrary evidence or cross-examination to displace that explanation, the first appellate authority&#039;s deletions were upheld and the additions were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1176 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765112</link>
      <description>Loose sheets, impounded papers and rough notings, without corroborative material, were held insufficient to sustain additions for alleged on-money, unexplained money or unexplained expenditure. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the papers were estimate-based or preparatory was accepted because the registered sale deeds reflected the recorded transactions and the Revenue produced no independent evidence of cash payments, undisclosed consideration or actual expenditure. In the absence of effective contrary evidence or cross-examination to displace that explanation, the first appellate authority&#039;s deletions were upheld and the additions were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>