<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1192 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765128</link>
    <description>BHC ruled in favor of Appellant, setting aside penalty under Section 271B of Income Tax Act. The Court found genuine cause for delay due to authority raids and seizure of documents. Considering similar precedents involving sister concerns and no revenue loss, the Court exercised discretion to waive penalty, emphasizing the quality of cause shown over delay duration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1192 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765128</link>
      <description>BHC ruled in favor of Appellant, setting aside penalty under Section 271B of Income Tax Act. The Court found genuine cause for delay due to authority raids and seizure of documents. Considering similar precedents involving sister concerns and no revenue loss, the Court exercised discretion to waive penalty, emphasizing the quality of cause shown over delay duration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>